New Vehicle Crossover, Kettering

Projects

New Vehicle Crossover, Kettering

Location
Kettering, Northants
Client
Astar Living
Value
Circa £7k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

We were approached by a regular customer of ours, Astar Living, to install a new vehicle crossover on Windmill Avenue in Kettering. The customer had already approached North Northants County Council and had got permission for a new Vehicle Crossover.

About the project

On our initial site visit we noticed a manhole cover in the middle of where the vehicle crossover was to go, and upon further inspection we found this to be the property of City Fibre. The manhole cover had to be lowered as part of the vehicle crossover works, we also needed to know whether or not the manhole cover was suitable for vehicular traffic, as some of them are not.

We made contact with City Fibre, and unfortunately we were bounced from department to department, and each time we were told that ‘somebody would get back to us’. We had to do a lot of chasing, and the whole process was very frustrating, and it took over 5 weeks to get an agreement from them that they would come and lower the manhole cover.

They agreed to do the work at no extra cost to us or our customer, but it had to be done under our traffic management, and under our Section 184 licence.  

It only took us two weeks to get our Section 184 licence – which we need to ‘dig up the pavement’ and install a vehicle crossover. Our next step was to give notice to Highways and book ‘roadspace’. We have to give three weeks’ notice ordinarily for minor works such as this in Northamptonshire, but we also had to co-ordinate with City Fibre to make sure that they were able to come on the dates that we wanted to book roadspace for. Eventually a date was decided on and we applied to Highways for roadspace and were allocated our preferred dates.

The crossover was on Windmill Avenue in Kettering, a very busy road. We were unable to close the footpath and divert pedestrians onto the other side of the road, and so we had to put up a temporary pedestrian walkway in the road, so pedestrians could safely go around our works.

The excavation of the existing path, putting in new sub-base and new kerbs both at the road and at the boundary with the customer’s private property, took two days. City Fibre came the next day as promised, and the tarmac was laid for the new crossover on day 4.

 

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 1 week

Time taken to obtain Section 184 Licence: 2 weeks

Time take to liaise with City Fibre: 5 weeks

Leadtime to use Licence: 3 weeks

Time taken to do the work: 4 days

Total time: 3 months

Want to know more about the ins and outs of vehicle crossovers? See here and click on the ‘Vehicle Crossovers’ tab for more information. If you want us to quote for a new vehicle crossover, click here, choose ‘Dropped Kerbs/Vehicle Crossovers’ in the drop-down box at the top and upload all the relevant information.

New Vehicle Crossover, Hardwick

Projects

New Vehicle Crossover, Hardwick, Case Study

Location
Hardwick, Cambridgeshire
Client
Private client
Value
Circa £7k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

We were approached our customer in Hardwick, Cambs, for a sewer connection for a new build, which we completed. We were then asked to quote for a vehicle crossover, which the customer had permission to do as part of the planning application. 

About the project

The crossover was a bit involved as it was on a 40mph road, and it was too busy to close the footpath. We had to put up a pedestrian walkway in the road, to safely divert the pedestrians. We excavated the area, which was quite large for a crossover, and was adjacent to a ‘bellmouth’ of a small shopping precinct next door.

We also had a very heavy manhole cover on a surface water catchpit, which had to be lowered. To do this, we had to reduce the ‘corbled masonry’ and fit a modern ‘biscuit’ on top of the catchpit. We re-fitted the original manhole cover as there was nothing wrong with it.

We laid new edging kerbs at the boundary with the new property. At the road we laid new ‘radius’ kerbs to from the entrance onto the crossover. Stone was laid in layers and compacted with a 120mm roller. Tarmac was laid in two stages, with the base course going down in the morning and 6mm tarmac to finish, in the afternoon.

The traffic management was kept up overnight to give the material time to cool down completely. The next day we returned to lay topsoil and grass seed either side of the new crossover, and cleared the site.

Timeline

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 1 week

Time taken to obtain Section 184 Licence: 3 weeks

Leadtime to use Licence: 3 weeks

Time taken to do the work: Less than 1 weeks

Total time: 2 months

 

Testimonial

Our customer was kind enough to leave us a 5-star review on Google:

“Superb company to deal with.
Excellent communication throughout, most helpful in meeting and exceeding time frames all backed up by a great works team who were polite, helpful and supportive whilst on site.
Thank you all 👍👍”

Click here to see more of our Google Reviews

Do you need a crossover doing? Click here and upload your measurements and pictures etc, and we’ll normally get a quote to you within a few days.

Click here to read our FAQs relating to dropped kerbs and vehicle crossovers.

Terms & Conditions relating to sewer connection quotes

Inclusion of fees in our quotes

In any initial quote that we supply for a Sewer Connection, we will always list fees that we expect to incur from Highways and water authorities alike. For Example we may quote £400 for a Section 50 and £350 for a Section 106. These figures should be reasonably accurate and will normally be based on our previous experience with different councils and different water authorities. However, due to the many different authorities we deal with, constantly changing fees, and the sometimes quite flexible nature of fees charged by these authorities, our estimates will not always be precise. Having listed a fee of – for example – £400 in our quote, if and when we put our applications in and we are alerted to a higher fee than that quoted to the customer, then these extra costs will be notified to the customer**

Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Zonal charge 

In addition to the cost of a Section 106, there is sometimes a charge from the water authority to the end user, sometimes referred to as a Zonal Charge or an Infrastructure Charge. This is often in the region of £400-£500 and is normally charged as part of the continual billing process between the water authority and the end user, soon after the connection is made. However, occasionally they will invoice us prior to the connection being made, and it may sometimes be sent to us during the Section 106 application. Whether this charge is invoiced directly to the customer after the connection has been made, or to us during the Section 106 application process and in advance of the connection having been done, this charge will never be included in our quote.

Case Studies

For most jobs that we do, we like to do a case study afterwards for our website, see here. The case study is just a brief description of the works, and will normally include some pictures of the works before, during and after. We will never include any pictures of our customer or any other individuals other than our own employees, and we will always be very selective of pictures taken on private property. We will normally give an indication of the value of the work and we will quote the name of the town or village, but won’t ever be more specific than that. We will normally quote the name of the company we are working for, but in the case of a private individual, we will simply refer to the customer as ‘private individual’. If you do not wish for us to compile a case study of work we do for you, please let us know prior to the job being completed. If you’re okay for us to do a case study but would rather some aspects be kept private, for example the value of the works, or the location etc, then please let us know. Even having published a case study, it is not too late for us to change something in the case study, or to remove certain pictures, or information, just let us know.

Payment Terms

Our payment terms will always be detailed in the email body of the original quote, and will normally be ‘payment on completion’. In the event that the value of the job is in excess of £10,000, we will normally request interim payment(s) to be made throughout the works. In the event that an interim payment is not made on time, we reserve the right to stop the works, indefinitely if required, if payment is not forthcoming. The customer in this instance will be liable for the cost of any works carried out but not completed.

**As a job progresses, if costs rise and the customer wishes to cancel their order with us, they can do as long as we have not started on site. In the event that fees have been paid to us by the customer, and these fees have been handed over to, for example, the Water Authority or to Highways, we do tend to be able to reclaim these fees back. In the event that the Water Authority or Highways are unable or unwilling to refund us,we will always refund our customer up to a maximum amount of £500 for each of these two authorities.

 

Important note: Anywhere below where you see a double asterisk** this relates to a point in the applications process whereby fees or costs may increase, but whereby we are still able to give a full refund at this point, for all fees paid so far. If you like, our customer has a right to change their mind and ‘walk away’ with all fees paid up until that point, being returned to them in full.

Bond payments. 

Our Fact Sheet here explains bonds in further detail.We will not always know at the quoting stage whether or not a bond will be requested from us, by Highways, and we will never know the exact amount, with this being confirmed later on at the consultation stage between us and Highways, after the Section 50 application has been submitted. 

But our initial quote will always make mention of the possibility of a bond. 

Quoted depths of public sewers

On all quotes for sewer connections, we will always quote the maximum depth of sewer. This will be the invert level of the sewer. We will ascertain the depth of a public sewer by a variety of means including:

  • Information from public records/water authority asset plans
  • Information given to us by our customer
  • Site survey

A site survey will normally be carried out prior to us starting on site, but even in the event that we do a site survey, we won’t always be able to confirm depth of the sewer by lifting manhole covers etc. Sometimes we won’t be able to lift manhole covers prior to traffic management being on site, sometimes our representative who comes to site won’t be able to lift a manhole cover on his own etc. 

In the event that we come to carry out the work and a sewer that we expected to be 2m deep is, for example, 2.2m deep, then the extra dig depth, time involved, extra muck away and extra materials etc, will be charged as extra, with the customer given as much notice as possible. 

Existing pipe materials & sizes

We will always assume public sewers to be ‘vitrified clay’ pipes, unless a Water Authority drawing details them to be another material, for example ductile iron, or MDPE etc. In the event that a public sewer pipe is not marked as being a material other than clay, and it turns out to be another type of material, then the extra cost as a result of this, will be chargeable to the customer** Examples include an asbestos pipe, not marked as such on a drawing. We will also assume the pipe size on a Water Authority drawing to be correct. If the size of the pipe is different then the extra cost will be chargeable to the customer. Both the pipe material and size may be confirmed at a site meeting prior to works starting, but this is not always possible. For example, if we have quoted for a junction insertion on a 225mm pipe, and the pipe turns out to be 300mm, the extra cost in this instance for materials alone, is £300

Traffic management type & associated fees

At the time of quoting we will always quote the type of traffic management we expect Highways to require, for example ‘Give & Take’ or ‘2-way traffic lights’ etc. We are unable to take advice from Highways in advance of submission of a Section 50 to Highways, as the fee we pay them as part of the application is for them to engage with us and often to meet us on site etc. As and when Highways require a higher level of traffic management than we have allowed for, these extra costs will be communicated to our customer**

In a few very exceptional cases, Highways will make changes to what they require from us, part way through the works being carried out. Examples include for traffic lights to be upgraded from 2-way to 3-way, or for the traffic lights to be ‘manually-controlled’. To manually control lights can be particularly expensive, and can cost anything from £350-£450/day. Unfortunately, it is quite common for traffic lights to be decided upon as the method of traffic management, but for Highways not to detail ‘manual controlling’ until the actual licence is issued by Highways, and this can sometimes be only days before the works start.  

Any such extra costs will always be chargeable to our customer, and of course once on site it is too late for the customer to cancel their order.

Water Authority sign-off

When a sewer connection is completed, this will usually be inspected by the Water Authority (WA) and a ‘sign-off’ of some sort issued, whether it be by email or on their online portal. And of course we repect that our customer will want to see this prior to making final payment to us. Most WAs will require that not only the connection be done and passed before the sign-off is issued, but they will usually require the demarcation chamber to be in as well, and to have been inspected. In most instances we do not fit the demarcation chamber, our customer will normally take care of this. In the event that we do not cover fitting of the demarcation chamber in our quote, and this has not been installed when the WA come to inspect our connection to the public sewer, the job as a whole will not be signed off by the WA, and a second inspection will be required at a later date. Our sewer connection quotes will usually detail ‘payment on completion’, and despite the job not having been signed off by the WA – in the event that our customer has not yet installed the demarcation chamber – these payment terms will still stand and we will still  expect payment on completion.   

Building Control sign-off

Building Control (BC) will rarely be concerned with the connection onto the public sewer, but will sometimes be concerned with the lateral pipework. In the event that this needs inspecting, it will be our customer’s responsibility to arrange inspection by BC, as the person who appointed BC.

CCTV Surveys

Unless specifically stated in our quotation, a CCTV survey of installed pipework will not have been included.
In some cases, Building Control may request a CCTV survey, and they often request this after the drainage work has been completed. If a CCTV survey is required, then we can quote for this, but we do need to know in advance, please. Alternatively, customers are welcome to arrange their own CCTV survey independently.

Adoption of pipework by water authority

Under a Section 106 connection to the public sewer, the water authority will always adopt the connection onto their sewer. This may be by way of junction insertion, saddle or construction of new manhole. The pipework between the connection and private property (also known as the ‘lateral’) will not normally be adopted, regardless of the fact that it is often in the Highway. Whether the lateral is adopted, or not, is dependent on many factors, including which Water Authority the S106 approval comes from:

Anglian Water will not ordinarily adopt the lateral under a S106 agreement, unless an extra fee is paid. We will always assume our customer does not wish for the lateral to be adopted, unless we are told otherwise*

Severn Trent will normally adopt the first 15 metres from the connection point under a Section 106 agreement*

Thames Water will not normally adopt the lateral under a S106 agreement 

*Even in the event that the Water Authority is willing to adopt some or all of the lateral, this will be normally be subject to their main criteria that the pipework is laid without any bends; water authorities tend not to allow bends on their network. As we are laying pipework amongst other services in the Highway, it is quite common that a slow bend may be required on pipework we lay, which will prohibit adoption. In the event that pipework must be adopted, we require clear instruction of this at the start of the quoting stage.

For laterals to be adopted properly, the best way to achieve this is with a Section 102 or a Section 104, these must be completed by our customer, we cannot act as agent and apply for a S102/S104.

Other Fact Sheets

Do you have a project you wish to discuss?

Sewer Connection, Stockport

Projects

Sewer Connection Stockport, Case Study

We were approached by long-time customer of ours Fox Construction of Chapenhall in Scotland. Fox undertake full refurbishments and new construction of Shell Petrol stations throughout the UK. Their job in Turncroft Lane, Stockport required us to make both a surface water and foul connection to the public sewer.

Location
Stockport, Cheshire
Client
Fox Construction Ltd
Value
Circa £39k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

Our objective was to lay surface water pipework from the site boundary of a new Shell Petrol Station in Stockport, and to connect into an existing surface water manhole in the carriageway. And then to do the same for the foul, connection into a manhole again. The surface water was 2m deep, however the foul connection was a bit more challenging, the connection into the existing foul manhole was to be made at 4.3m dig depth. The presence of a Medium Pressure Gas Man within our excavation had to be factored in as to how the works would be carried out. 

About the project

Despite these works being quite challenging in many different ways, traffic management was quite simple on this one. The two connections to the sewer were made at the back of the site, onto a quieter road, and we were therefore able to use ‘give & take’ traffic management.

However, the road was riddled with services including multiple high voltage electric ducts, large water mains, two gas mains (one of them Medium Pressure) and also two very large decommissioned steel mains, likely to have been gas & water. We also had to contend with lower voltage electric cables & BT ducts.

The surface water connection was done first, this required us to excavate in the pavement and a metre into the carriageway, where connection was made into an existing surface water manhole. The depth of this connection was 2 metres. The excavation was sheeted and a third party core-driller was brought in to core-drill the manhole. The pipework was installed, the excavation backfilled, and the manhole was ‘made good’ inside. 

The foul connection required excavation in the footpath also, and then 4 linear metres into the carriageway in the direction of the existing foul manhole. This manhole was 4.3m deep, and United Utilities (owner of the apparatus) required a soffit-to-soffit connection, as is usual for foul connections in particular. The excavation in the carriageway was extensive and required a large pit excavating 4m wide and across half of the carriageway. Within this excavation was an existing Medium Pressure Gas Main, amongst many other services. The presence of the MP Gas Main required us to consult with the owner of the apparatus, Cadent. We put proposals to Cadent which excluded use of the excavator within 1 metre of the Gas Main. Adjacent to the MP main, we had to hand dig, and then the bulk of the excavating was done with a Vacuum Excavator (Vac-Ex), which is basically a big vacuum the size of a very large lorry, see pictures below.

As the MP Gas Main would be passing through our excavation, and the supporting ground dug out from underneath it, the gas main would need to be supported from above. We put proposals to Cadent which included a 5m long steel beam, 150mm x 100mm, placed directly above the gas main. From the steel beam, we strapped the gas main at 500mm centres. Cadent approved all of our proposals and visited site to inspect our method of working, which was all satisfactory to them. 

The excavation at its deepest was 4.3m, which had to be excavated with the Vac-Ex in stages, with us inserting trench sheets, heavy timbers, and acrows as the excavation got deeper. Ordinarily a ‘trench box’ would be lowered into the ground, but with all the services we had to contend with, the excavation had to be sheeted out around and underneath the services. The deepest part of the excavation was directly under the gas main. 

With all of the trench sheeting complete, a third party core-driller was brought in and the manhole core-drilled. The pipework was installed for the foul from the site to the manhole. The manhole was very small inside, for its depth, such as they used to be, this is likely a Victorian-era manhole. As with any manhole entry though, an operative has to be lowered down on a winch, with gas tests done prior and during entry into the manhole. Should anything happen to the operative whilst down the manhole, he would be winched out as opposed to somebody going down there to rescue him. All of our operatives have confined-space training for this reason, which has to be updated and renewed regularly. We cannot undertake new sewer connections without these accreditations, and of course it’s what is needed to keep everybody safe. 

The deep excavation was filled with primary aggregate, with all excavated material having been removed from site. The excavations for both the surface water and foul sewer connection were reinstated at the same time, and the site cleared of all signage and plant & machinery etc.

This was a challenging sewer connection due to the depth of the foul in particular, and also as a result of the Medium Pressure Gas Main, exactly where we didn’t want it. But as always there is a safe method of carrying out these types of works, no matter what the depth and the difficulties involved.

It was a pleasure to have carried out this work for Fox Construction and JW Clark continue to work with Fox Construction on sites across the UK.

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: Less than 1 week

Time taken to obtain Section 106 Licence: 4 weeks

Time taken to obtain Section 50 Licence: 10 weeks

Leadtime to use S50 Licence: 3 weeks

Time taken to do the work: 2 weeks

Total time: 20 weeks from enquiry by Fox, to the work being completed

Do you need a sewer connection needs doing? Don’t leave it too late, most people do! Read our article here: How long does it take to do a sewer connection?

 

Highways Bonds – A guide

Why do Highways ask for a bond to be paid?

Any work done in the Highway is subject to inspection after reinstatement has been completed. The first inspection is generally done when the work is complete, but a final inspection is not done until 2 years later (at the end of the ‘maintenance period‘). Sometimes this can be extended to 3 years for a particularly deep connection.

In the event that the work is defective at the end of this maintenance period, for example because the tarmac has sunk, the contractor who carried out the work is legally obliged to rectify the defect.

In recent years, Highways at various County Councils have seen a reduction in the quality of work, in respect of reinstatement in particular. This is often as a result of companies setting up to carry out this type of work, not doing the work to the required standard, and then as the number of defects pile up the company will often dissolve, leaving Highways to pick up the bill. The same people will then set up another company and likely do the same thing again. For this reason, Highways are increasingly asking for a bond to be paid.

Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

How much is the bond normally?
We have known Highways to request bonds as little as £200-£300 for Councils outside of the London area, and for small works on minor roads. However some Councils are asking for bonds upwards of £1,000. For a minor sewer connection in Wimbledon we were recently asked to pay a bond of £1,500, and £5,000 for a major sewer connection in Hendon, these amounts are quite common in the London and surrounding areas. Some councils however, still do not request bonds. And we still find ourselves to be in a fortunate situation with some councils, whereby they do not apply bonds to us, because they know us well and trust our work.

When is the bond returned?
The bond is sometimes returned after the first inspection, which is done immediately after the work is complete. However it is more common for the bond to be returned after the end of the Maintenance Period, which is usually 2 years, or in some cases 3 years, for a particularly deep connection.

Why does JW Clark Ltd ask the customer to stand the cost of the bond?
As the bulk of our work is sewer connections, we are doing upwards of 50 or 60 sewer connections each year. However we are only a small company, and it is not possible for us to fund this volume of bond payments.  Our customers however, most of them reasonably small developers, would only tend to do a handful of developments each year, and a lot of them only 1 or 2 per year. For this reason we consider it to be more manageable for each developer to pay the cost of the bond, and it also enables us to keep our prices more competitive.

Will the customer have to chase Highways for the bond at the end of the maintenance period?
No, at JW Clark Ltd we keep a record of all bond payments, and we diarise chasing the bond in the lead-up to the end of the maintenance period. Our accounts department takes care of this. Of course the customer is welcome to chase Highways as well, if they wish.

Does the customer pay the bond to JW Clark Ltd or straight to Highways?

Our customer can either pay the bond directly to Highways, or we can pay the bond to Highways and add the cost to our initial invoice to the customer. Either is acceptable to us, whichever is our customer’s preference. Either way, the bond will need to be paid before any works are carried out on site.

What if the work is not passed at the end of the maintenance period and the bond is withheld by Highways?
It has never happened before. JW Clark Ltd have a 100% success rate in bonds being returned at the end of the Maintenance Period. However, we guarantee that in the unlikely event that a bond is withheld by Highways as a result of a defect, we will pay the bond amount to our customer straight away.

What guarantee do I have that JW Clark Ltd will honour all of the above?
JW Clark Ltd are legally obliged to stand by what we promise here. We have been about a long time – incorporated in 2002 – and we plan to be here for many years yet. And if you need any re-assurance that we are a trustworthy company, take a look at our many 5-star reviews on Google here, numbering in excess of 100 at the time of writing. In the event that our customer wants anything more substantial signing, in the form of a legal contract, then we would be more than happy to oblige.
Any more questions on bonds or anything else? Please feel free to ask.

Other Fact Sheets

Do you have a project you wish to discuss?

Stafford Sewer Connections

Projects

Stafford Sewer Connections, Case Study

We were approached by Pritpal of Dulkoo Properties, in Stafford, he had built a new house and needed a connection to the sewer, for both foul and surface water.

Location
Stafford, Staffordshire
Client
Dulkoo Properties
Value
Circa £30k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

Our objective was to make a connection to the surface water connection in the Highway, at 1.5m deep and lay pipework back to the site boundary. The foul connection was a bit trickier at 3.5m deep, and from here we also laid pipework back to the site boundary.

About the project

We met with Stafford Highways to discuss traffic management for the job, and despite the works being on a 3-way junction, we agreed on 2-way traffic lights, but with signage on the side road indicating that traffic on the main road was under signal control. We located the surface water pipe on day 1, on the opposite side of the road to the site. The existing pipe was less than 1.5m deep, and the connection was made using ‘junction insertion’ method. The connection was inspected and passed by Severn Trent Water, and then from the connection point we laid pipework back to the site boundary. The STW Inspector requested that the pipework be concrete-protected, due to how shallow it was in the carriageway. With the surface water pipe laid and the excavation backfilled, we reinstated the Highway to Stafford Highways’ spec. As a Class 1 road, this required in excess of 300mm of tarmac to be laid, in three layers. 

 

The new road surface was allowed to cool overnight, and the traffic lights were switched over in the morning, and excavation was started in preparation for the foul connection. At an invert depth of over 3.5m, we expected to find the top of the 450mm foul sewer at a depth of approx. 3 metres. Due to the depth of the excavation, an extensive amount of trench sheeting and acrow props were required to enable safe entry into the excavation for our operatives. Having excavated down to 2.5m however, and having made the excavation safe, we started to encounter groundwater coming into the sides of the excavation deep down, which were unable to control with pumps. The ground was ‘silty’ and the volume of water made it impossible for us to continue. With the water content we had to deal with and the nature of the ground combined, it is not possible to use pumps to remove the water. We consulted Dewatering Services Ltd whom we have used on a number of occasions, and made plans for them to come to site to ‘dewater’ the ground. Unfortunately they were unable to come there and then, and due to the traffic-sensitive nature of the road, Highways required us to abandon the excavation, reinstate the road and remove the traffic management, which we did. 

 

Just over a week later, we set up the traffic lights all over again….! And Dewatering Services Ltd came to site. In preparation for their arrival, we had re-dug down to a depth of just over two metres, and reinstalled the trench-sheeting system. The Dewatering system included metal rods being pushed 5m into the ground, the whole system was installed in a day. 24 hours later and the excavation had been dried out, we excavated down another metre or so to get to our target depth of 3m, and installed more trench sheets and supports further down. We located the top of the 450mm concrete sewer at 3.15m down from the road level. The concrete sewer was encased in more concrete, which needed to be broken off carefully with a handheld breaker, to gain clear access to the pipe for core-drilling. We instructed a professional core-driller to core-drill into the concrete pipe. With the hole having been cored, we fixed a clay saddle onto the 450mm sewer and secured the saddle and the first clay pipe, with extra-strong and quick-setting mortar. From the connection point we continued to lay 100mm clay pipes towards the boundary. This included excavating under numerous existing services both in the carriageway and in the pavement and cycleway. 

 

The dewatering equipment was removed from site as soon as we came up to 1.5m dig depth, near to the site. The excavation was backfilled and the carriageway, pavement and cycleway all permanently reinstated.  


The project was a reasonably challenging one, due to the dig depth and the water content within the ground. But it is not unusual to encounter groundwater such as this, especially at this depth, and we have plenty of expertise in this area, and often at much deeper depths as well. It was a pleasure to have carried out this work for Pritpal, and we wish him every success with this project and any others we are able to help with going forward. 

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 1 week

Time taken to obtain Section 106 Licence: Our customer already had this

Time taken to obtain Section 50 Licence: The licence only took a few weeks to obtain…. 

Leadtime to use S50 Licence: …….but we had to wait in excess of 3 months before the work could be started, due to other works being undertaken in the area, a road closure around the corner. Highways will not often permit two jobs to run concurrently within a certain radius, and we are never able to carry out works in what is a ‘diversion route’ for another road closure.

Time taken to do the work: 3.5 weeks including us having to go away for a week and then come back with Dewatering Services

Total time: 4.5 months including the delay in being able to use our Section 50 licence, due to other roadworks being carried out in the vicinity. 

Do you need a sewer connection needs doing? Don’t leave it too late, most people do! Read our article here: How long does it take to do a sewer connection?

Stagsden 2 x New Builds

Projects

Stagsden 2 x new builds, Case Study

We were pleased to have been approached by James Taylor from Stagsden, Bedfordshire, and invited to quote for groundwork for 2 x new builds. We had previously worked for James’s father whereby we did the groundwork for another new build, again in Bedfordshire

Location
Stagsden, Bedfordshire
Client
Private customer
Value
Circa £70k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

Our objective was to demolish 3 existing farm buildings, which were to be replaced by 2 new dwellings. We were instructed to carrry out demolition, footings for the new builds, masonry to underside of block and beam, installation of block and beam floor, installation of 2 x treatment plants for the new builds and rainwater drainage including soakaways. 

About the project

Demolition

Our first task on site was to demolish 3 existing farm buildings. Our customer, acting as Principal Contractor, facilitated an asbestos survey, as we suspected at least one of the roofs to be asbestos. The roof was indeed asbestos, and we recommended WJ Redden from Wellingborough, to safely take down the roof and remove the material from site. With the asbestos safely removed, we bought an 8 tonne machine to site, with a grapple bucket attached, and set to demolishing each of the three buildings in turn. The mixed waste was put into skips and removed from site. Any hardcore from the walls and floors was kept on site, to be crushed later on for future use. 

Footings

One of the two barns was to be built with a standard concrete ‘strip’ footing, the drawings detailed 1m dig depth, however we proactively went down to 1.2m due to the top of the dig appearing to be made-up ground. Building Control and the Warranty Provider were happy with the dig, and we continued to pour the concrete footings. On the second barn a piled foundation was required, due to the close proximity of trees on site. The customer had instructed a structural engineer to design the ringbeam, which would sit on the piles. A pile design was put together by the same structural engineer and we instructed a third party piling company. The piles were steel casings driven into the ground, welded together as they were dropped in, and then filled with concrete and reinforcing bars. With the piling complete, we broke off the top of each pile and cut the metal casing on each to the correct height, and then bent the reinforcing bar into where our ringbeam would sit. The ringbeam dig was lined with cellcore to the bottom and then permanent formwork installed all round. The ringbeam was constructed on site and each section lowered in and fixed together. Claymaster was required on the inside of the permanent formwork, all part of the design and as a resut of the trees on site. The concrete ringbeam was poured, completing the foundations for both barns.

Drainage

We installed all foul drainage prior to the masonry being done. This included laying underground drainage pipes to the positions of foul stacks inside each barn for the foul. As there is no public sewer in the village, we installed two treatment plants, one for each barn. These were ‘6-person Marsh Ensign’ treatment plants, a modern-day equivalent of a septic tank. These were installed in full concrete surround as per the manufacturer’s specification. We laid a drainage field for each treatment plant, within the site. Soakaways were installed for rainwater drainage, and pipes laid from the downpipe positions on each house, to the soakaways. 

Masonry

The oversites were reduced to give 200mm clearance under where the block beam would sit, and then we did the masonry to the underside of the block and beam. This consisted of a total of 300mm, so a block and a brick in most places, on both the inner and outer courses. Facework would be done later on by the building contractor doing the superstructure. 

Block and beam

The block and beam was installed, using 150mm beams throughout and 3.5N blocks, and finished with a cement slurry. This concluded this part of the project for us. 

A building contractor was instructed to take over soon after we left, but we expect to return to site at a later date when the new dwellings are built, to install services from the Highway, to each barn. With the services in, we will install a road from the Highway to the new barns, at the moment the road is a hardcore track, suitable for construction traffic throughout the build. 

It was great to have worked with James on this project, especially as we had worked for his Dad on a similar project many years before. And we look forward to returning at a later date to install the services and to put the final road in.

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 2 weeks

Time taken to demolish 3 existing barns and remove waste from site: 1 week

Time taken to install foundations for both barns: Total of 3 weeks including piling contractors coming to site

Time taken to install all drainage: 2.5 weeks including installation of 2 x treatment plants and drainage fields

Time taken to do masonry for both barns: 1 week

Time taken to install block and beam: 1 week

Associated works including site set-up and clearing site at end of project: 1 week

Total time on site: 9.5 weeks

How long does a sewer connection take?

How long does a sewer connection take?

A sewer connection in the Highway (doing the actual physical work) can take as little as a few days, up to a week or two. And occasionally longer in the event that the public sewer is a long way from the site.

Beware though – the paperwork required in advance will take much, much longer…

….You will need to do a Section 106 application first, which we will normally take care of for you. A Section 106 application will normally be completed and the ‘Approval Letter’ issued within 3 weeks, though it can sometimes take longer dependent on the complexity of the job, current lead times with the water authority and the extent of their enquiries throughout the application process.

Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

In the event that the public sewer is in the Highway (90% of the time) we will then need to apply to the Highways Department at the local County Council for a Section 50 Licence, ordinarily you cannot do this yourself, we have to do it for you. This process cannot normally be started until you/we have the Section 106 Approval Letter from the water authority – as Highways need to know that the Water Authority are in agreement and that the connection is ‘legal’.

It cannot be stressed enough the extent to which a Section 50 is an integral part of the application process, and its effect on the whole timeline from start to finish.

Click here for more information on the Section 50 application process.

The time taken to process a Section 50 application is dependent on many different factors including the complexity of the job. Quite often the process will involve a site meeting between us and a Highways Inspector, and representations back and forth between us and Highways, before a decision is made on details such as method of traffic management to be used, sequence of works etc. At the majority of councils the whole process can take anything from 1-3 months, but with some, the process can take 6-9 months

Once everything has been agreed and the Section 50 licence has been issued, we have to give notice to Highways that we want to use it. For a very small job in the Highway, the notice period can be as little as 1-2 weeks. For a week’s work in the Highway, the notice we have to give is often a minimum of 3 weeks, and it is often 3 months or more for a major project.

What is a Section 106 to a Water Authority – and how long does it take?An increasing number of jobs in the Highway require a road closure, and the minimum legal notice period for one of these is 3 months. And just because we give notice to Highways as to when we wish to use our licence, we won’t necessarily get permission to do so. There must be no other roadworks going on within a certain radius of the site at the time, and in some instances other contractors could have booked ‘road space’ in the surrounding area for many months concurrently, meaning you’ll have to join the back of the queue. In some areas you cannot work during school term time, you’ll have to wait for the next school holiday – that’s as long as other contractors do not already have ‘road space’ booked for then. So all in all:

Time required to get a Section 106 to connect to a public sewer 3-6 weeks.
Then… Time required to get a Section 50 to ‘dig up the road’ 1-3 months. (But in some cases 6-9 months)
Then… Notice period to be able to use a Section 50 Licence 1-12 weeks+
Then… Time taken to do the work (normally) 3 – 10 days.
Total amount of time anything between 2 and 8 months. 

In the event that you need a sewer connection doing please contact us as soon as possible! 

You’ll be surprised how many people build a house and then ask us to start the sewer connection process, whereas this process needs starting ideally when the build starts.

Click here to read our article What is a Section 50 Application to Highways – it’s what takes up the bulk of the time in the administrative preparation for a sewer connection.

Click here to read our article What is a Section 106 to a Water Authority and how long does it take

Click here to make contact about your project. Our initial estimates are done without a visit to site, providing you can supply all of the information requested in the online form. 

And if you have any other questions, please don’t hesitate to ask!

Other Fact Sheets

Do you have a project you wish to discuss?

Woodcote Sewer Connection

Projects

Woodcote Sewer Connection, Case Study

Location
Woodcote, South Oxfordshire
Client
Greenham Construction Ltd
Value
Circa £14k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

We were delighted to be approached by Greenham Construction from Newbury, a first-time customer. They were building a high-end property in Woodcote, South Oxfordshire, and needed the property connecting to the public sewer.

About the project

The property being built was a long way from the Highway, and the levels didn’t work with getting into the public sewer by gravity. Therefore a pump system was installed within the site, an MDPE pipe was laid in the track leading to the site, and a ‘break chamber’ installed a few metres from the boundary with the Highway. This was all done by the customer, with us instructed to do the gravity work in the Highway. 

The customer already had the Section 106 approval, which detailed connection onto the public sewer by way of new manhole construction. We put a quote together for our customer based on information provided to us, the Thames Water Asset Drawing, and also what we were able to see on Google Earth and Google Street View.

The customer was happy with our quote in principal, so we did a site visit whereby we lifted manholes to check pipe depths etc. The road was fairly narrow for the work that was required and we were concerned that a road closure would be required, which would have added a few thousand pounds to the cost. Ordinarily we need to leave 3.5m carriageway width outside of our works, but we were only able to leave 3m. However Oxfordshire Highways were happy with 3m available carriageway, so the works were able to proceed using ‘give & take’ traffic management, which is normally the cheapest method. 

We started on site two months after our initial contact with the customer. Upon locating the existing sewer we found the pipe material to be asbestos, which are still quite common. Our operatives are asbestos-trained for this reason, and we took all necessary precautions to ensure that the existing pipe in the road was cut safely and as per H&S regulations relating to asbestos.We constructed the new manhole on top of the existing sewer using concrete 1.2m diameter sections, finished with a ‘biscuit’ and a 150mm D400 manhole cover. 

We then excavated for and laid the pipework from the new manhole, to the boundary with the customer’s property. The pipework we laid was a bit under 2m deep, and consisted of a few metres in the carriageway and the remainder in the tarmac footpath. As this was a quiet road, we closed the footpath and diverted pedestrians onto the other side of the road whilst the works were carried out. With the pipes laid, trenches backfilled and reinstated, the Highway was reopened and the site cleared 6 days after we started. 

It was a pleasure to carry out these works for Greenham Construction and we look forward to working with them again in the future.

Timeline

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 1 week

Time taken to obtain Section 106 Licence: (Customer already had this)

Time taken to obtain Section 50 Licence: 3 weeks

Leadtime to use Licence: 4 weeks

Time taken to do the work: 1 week

Total time: 9 weeks

Do you need a sewer connection needs doing? Don’t leave it too late, most people do! Read our article here: How long does it take to do a sewer connection?

Weavers School, Wellingborough

Projects

Weavers School, Wellingborough, Case Study

Location
Wellingborough, Northants
Client
Weavers Academy
Value
£xx k
Sewer Connections - Building-Site-Scene - JW Clark

Objective

We were approached by Weavers Academy in Wellingborough, to lay an electric duct from an onsite substation, to a classroom block, for a new 3-phase connection. 

About the project

The work was done in the school holidays so as to minimise disruption to the school, and also with safety of the pupils and staff in mind. National Grid required that we lay 40 metres of 125mm diameter duct, which they supplied. A CAT survey was done to identify some underground services, we also dug some trial holes and lifted various manholes to ascertain a line of trench. 

The tarmac surface was covered with a fine 0-6mm gravel, which we swept to one side, to be put back later.

The trench was sawcut and broke out by one team, whilst a second team carefully excavated the trench 700mm deep. The 125mm pipe was laid in a soft sand surround, with warning tape to cover, and a draw cord pulled through.

The trench was backfilled with some of the excavated material, and then Type 1 MOT granite, all compacted in layers with a trench wacker. The tarmac was reinstated as 60mm base course and 30mm of 6mm topping, a bit more than was there previously. We swept the fine gravel back over the top, and the site was handed back to the customer 5 days after we started and ready for when the school opened the following week. 

Customer review

“I would like to say the crew we had on site were a credit to your company, very polite and aware of their surroundings especially working at a school, the crew we had really were spot on and as I said a real credit to the company, please pass on our thanks to them as I didn’t get to see them before the job finished.”

Timeline

Time taken to quote for the works: 24 hours

Time taken to do the work: 5 days